EUROPE'S PRE-COLUMBIAN LINGUISTIC CONNECTION TO AMERICA
A Wendish farmhouse in Northern Germany (long-house)
Languages cannot be faked. They present incontrovertible evidence of a people having either settled in the area where traces of their language are found today, or having had trading contacts with it over an extended period of time.
I am glad I can give some additional support to the cause of American cultural diffusionists. I detected in Migmaq and Cree native languages a large vocabulary and a number of grammatical characteristics which they share with the ancient Indo-European language, called Wendish or Windish. I have found traces of this language also in many other American and Near- and Far-Eastern territories, far beyond the areas where Indo-European is acknowledged to have exerted its influence.
This is the second European language which forms part of the Algonquian linguistic set up. Readers of the A.A. are already acquainted with Norse, still spoken in rural Norway, which forms a large part of the Leni Lenape native language, as Reider T. Sherwin had fully proven in his meticulously researched books, published already in the 1940s. Myron Paine has further developed Sherwin's insights, based on his analysis of the native Leni Lenape immigration history, preserved in the picture writing of the Maalan Olum. Namely, that Vikings from Greenland, who had brought Norse to North America between 1000 and 1400 A.D., were already Christians.
My linguistic discoveries, and recent DNA research of the oldest Viking graves in Greenland, show that the majority of Greenland Vikings were of Celtic, not Germanic origin. After having studied ancient Gallic inscriptions collected by the Harvard linguist, prof. Joshua Whatmough, in his book, The Dialects of Ancient Gaul, I came to the conclusion that Continental Celts were, in fact, Wends - who spoke the language of my own people, Austrian Wends.
This opens up further questions. For example, were these Greenlandic Wendish Vikings still speaking Wendish when they arrived in North America? As such, were they the source of the extensive Wendish vocabularies I have detected in Migmaq and Cree languages? If so, why then were the earliest Jesuit missionaries describing them as sun-god worshippers? Or were Greenland's Wends already speaking Norse under the influence of Norse priests, who had converted them to Christianity? If this was the case, it would explain the presence and prevalence of Norse in the Leni Lenape native language. Or was the origin of Wendish in Algonquian languages due to several migrations at other times in the past?
Who
are Wends?
I must explain here who Wends are, for two reasons. Firstly, because most likely none of A.ncient American.'s readers has ever heard of them and, secondly, because, if you look them up on Wikipedia, or any other official reference source, you will find information which is not only distorted but is, in fact, totally fictitious, from start to finish. You can find data supporting my admittedly unorthodox assertions elsewhere on this website.
Readers of the A.A. magazine may not be aware of the fact that official historians in Europe, and their mentors, in no way differ from their American colleagues, in their stubborn resistance to any changes in the status quo of their officially held positions. However, while American cultural diffusionists have almost won their struggle for objectivity and truth, the battle for them in Europe has not even begun. Worse, there is also no equivalent of the Ancient American magazine in Europe, no Ancient European, in which those who have noticed incongruities and discrepancies in now firmly rooted official versions of history, could air their doubts and results of their unbiased research. This would start a public debate and ensure that eventually the fictional official versions of their histories are replaced by those based on facts.
I must explain here who Wends are, for two reasons. Firstly, because most likely none of A.ncient American.'s readers has ever heard of them and, secondly, because, if you look them up on Wikipedia, or any other official reference source, you will find information which is not only distorted but is, in fact, totally fictitious, from start to finish. You can find data supporting my admittedly unorthodox assertions elsewhere on this website.
Readers of the A.A. magazine may not be aware of the fact that official historians in Europe, and their mentors, in no way differ from their American colleagues, in their stubborn resistance to any changes in the status quo of their officially held positions. However, while American cultural diffusionists have almost won their struggle for objectivity and truth, the battle for them in Europe has not even begun. Worse, there is also no equivalent of the Ancient American magazine in Europe, no Ancient European, in which those who have noticed incongruities and discrepancies in now firmly rooted official versions of history, could air their doubts and results of their unbiased research. This would start a public debate and ensure that eventually the fictional official versions of their histories are replaced by those based on facts.
Continued on next page.)